Angiotensin receptor blockers in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: A comparison of VANISH and INHERIT randomized trials.

PURPOSE: To identify the cause of discrepancy between the INHERIT trial and VANISH trial in regards to disease modification of angiotensin receptor II blockers in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). METHODS: We replicated the data analysis used in VANISH, converting individual change in each component of the composite endpoint into a z-score and applying this z-score to the INHERIT results. RESULTS: No significant improvement was identified in the composite z-score between the 2 groups at 12-month follow-up (P = .4). With the exception of tissue Doppler systolic (s') velocity, we found no significant benefit or harm from losartan compared to placebo for any of the individual components of the composite score at 12-month follow-up. Results were similar in analyses without imputed data or when restricted to patients with sarcomeric HCM. CONCLUSION: Despite applying the potentially more sensitive composite z-score endpoint as in the VANISH trial, no statistically significant benefits from the use of losartan compared to placebo could be detected at 12-month follow-up in patients with overt HCM participating in the INHERIT trial.

The COVID-19 in athletes (COVA) study: a national study on cardio-pulmonary involvement of SARS-CoV-2 infection among elite athletes.

Background: COVID-19 can cause cardiopulmonary involvement. Physical activity and cardiac complications can worsen prognosis, while pulmonary complications can reduce performance. Aims: To determine the prevalence and clinical implications of SARS-CoV-2 cardiopulmonary involvement in elite athletes. Methods: An observational study between 1 July 2020 and 30 June 2021 with the assessment of coronary biomarkers, electrocardiogram, echocardiography, Holter-monitoring, spirometry, and chest X-ray in Danish elite athletes showed that PCR-tested positive for SARS-CoV-2. The cohort consisted of male football players screened weekly (cohort I) and elite athletes on an international level only tested if they had symptoms, were near-contact, or participated in international competitions (cohort II). All athletes were categorized into two groups based on symptoms and duration of COVID-19: Group 1 had no cardiopulmonary symptoms and duration ≤7 days, and; Group 2 had cardiopulmonary symptoms or disease duration >7 days. Results: In total 121 athletes who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 were investigated. Cardiac involvement was identified in 2/121 (2%) and pulmonary involvement in 15/121 (12%) participants. In group 1, 87 (72%), no athletes presented with signs of cardiac involvement, and 8 (7%) were diagnosed with radiological COVID-19-related findings or obstructive lung function. In group 2, 34 (28%), two had myocarditis (6%), and 8 (24%) were diagnosed with radiological COVID-19-related findings or obstructive lung function. Conclusions: These clinically-driven data show no signs of cardiac involvement among athletes who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 infection without cardiopulmonary symptoms and duration <7 days. Athletes with cardiopulmonary symptoms or prolonged duration of COVID-19 display, exercise-limiting cardiopulmonary involvement.